Weather | Traffic | Surf | Maps | Webcam


   
 
Forums Visitors Guide Shopping Classifieds Autos Homes Jobs Entertainment Sports Today's Paper Home

 News
 Metro | Latest News
 North County
 Temecula/Riverside
 Tijuana/Border
 California
 Nation
 Mexico
 World
 Obituaries
 Today's Paper
 AP Headlines
 Business
 Technology
 Biotech
 Markets
 In Depth
 Iraq / Afghanistan
 Pension Crisis
 Special Reports
 Video
 Multimedia
 Photo Galleries
 Topics
 Education
 Features
 Health | Fitness
 Military
 Politics
 Science
 Solutions
 Opinion
 Columnists
 Steve Breen
 Forums
 Weblogs
 Communities
 U-T South County
 U-T East County
 Solutions
 Calendar
 Just Fix It
 Services
 Weather
 Traffic
 Surf Report
 Archives
 E-mail Newsletters
 Wireless | RSS
 Noticias en Enlace
 Internet Access

 Sponsored Links

Hearing is scheduled in attempt to reverse city's hotel approval


UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

August 21, 2008

OCEANSIDE – A proposed luxury beachfront hotel the Oceanside City Council has eagerly awaited is facing another delay.

A group called Citizens for the Preservation of Parks and Beaches had appealed to the California Coastal Commission to overturn the city's approval of the hotel proposal, and yesterday the commission set a hearing of Sept. 10 in Eureka.

The same citizens group thwarted a hotel once proposed by San Diego developer Douglas Manchester on the same site by taking its complaints to the commission.

The group rallied about 300 people to oppose the Manchester project. Opposition to the new hotel proposed by San Diego developer S.D. Malkin Properties has been minimal, however.

Malkin wants to build a 289-room hotel, a second 47-room hotel, 48 time shares, restaurants, shops and ballroom on two city-owned blocks on Pacific Street between Seagaze Drive and Pier View Way in downtown Oceanside.

The appeal, filed by the co-founders of the citizens group, former Councilwoman Shari Mackin and Carolyn Krammer, cites concern that the hotel will exacerbate parking problems in the area. Jane McVey, the city's economic and community development director, replied to the commission yesterday that parking studies already have been accepted for the project.

Malkin first bid to build the project in 2004 and has faced numerous bureaucratic delays ever since.

The hotel itself did not need Coastal Commission approval, although City Council approval could be appealed to the state agency. That's what Mackin and Krammer have done.

In the meantime, the city has amended its Local Coastal Plan, which sets guidelines for development along the coastline, to include the type of time shares the project envisions. Those amendments have undergone two Coastal Commission meetings and much back-and-forth between commission and city staff members.

The last tweaking of the wording was due to be approved by the City Council last night, but the matter was removed from the agenda, McVey said, because the city is still awaiting some proposed language from the commission's attorney.

The Coastal Commission hearing on Sept. 10 is set for 10 a.m. in the Wharfinger Building, 1 Marina Way, Eureka.


Lola Sherman: (760) 476-8241; lola.sherman@uniontrib.com


 Sponsored Links






Quicklinks
Restaurants Bars
Hotels Autos
Shopping Health
Eldercare Singles
Business Listings
Free Newsletters


Guides
Vegas Spas/Salon
Travel Weddings
Wine Old Town
Baja Catering
Casino Home Imp.
Golf SD North
Gaslamp


© Copyright 1995-2008 Union-Tribune Publishing Co. • A Copley Newspaper Site